Sunday, August 25, 2013

What Happened to Ning Li and Her Anti-Gravity Research?

I remember reading this article in Popular Mechanics when it came out in 1999. Not long after, I ran into Dr. Campbell. (the guy on the left with his NASA badge tucked in his pocket) and asked him about the project. He seemed to be optimistic about its chances at success.
That was over a decade ago. Now, the head scientist, Dr. Ning Li, (lady in the middle) has apparently disappeared a few years ago, and Larry Smalley (the guy on the right), the former chairman of the University of Alabama at Huntsville physics department has apparently died.
This project they were working on was nothing less than Earth shattering. This device, if the claims of the scientists are to be believed, could possibly have led to sci-fi types of things like force fields, tractor beams and artificial gravity.
What happened? Where did the research go? What happened to Ning Li? 
Google searching brings up tin foil hat type of conspiracies among other accusations that this is nothing but "Fringe Science" or "Pseudo Science",
Possibly is, but these are verifiable and respectable scientists. NASA did research. Ning Li did start a company up called AC Gravity and obtained a grant from the DOD to pursue research.
I would like to know what happened... did it turn out to be nothing? Did Ning Li run off with the grant money? Apparently she is from a very wealthy family of respectable scientists, so I don't readily buy that theory.

Anyone else familiar with this? This happened right here in Huntsville Alabama.

At this Zoominfo link, I found this:
May, 2003: Dr. Ning Li sends a private email to colleagues claiming to have experimentally verified a large-scale AC-Gravity measuring "11-kilowatts of output effect", and abruptly disappears from public view. (this is her last known public communication)

UPDATE:
While utilizing my cyber search Kung Fu, I was able to find this document which is apparently an email between Timothy Ventura and Eugene Podkletnov. 

From: Ventura, Timothy [timothy.ventura@attws.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:37 PM
To: tventura6@comcast.net
Subject: FW: Tracking Down Dr. Ning Li



-----Original Message-----
From: Eugene Podkletnov [mailto:epodkletnov@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:34 PM
To: timothy.ventura@attws.com
Subject: RE: Tracking Down Dr. Ning Li


********************************************
Dear Tim,

All I can tell you is that Ning is all right, she is working for DOD and

therefore is not permitted to discuss her work openly. I do not know her

working email address, she phoned me couple of times this year and we
had
some brief exchange of opinions on superconductors and their structure.
I know that her parents, brother and husband all live in the USA, they
are
doctors and rather rich.
Ning still has an apartment in Huntsville but I do not know where her
lab is
situated now.
DOD is a serious organisation and I frankly have no idea how to get the
address. Still, Ning Li was present at the conference on gravity waves
organised by MITRE, they should have her address.

The idea of gravity shielding seems to attract people from China, a
theoretical article was published by Ning Wu, as discussed at Greenglow.

Later, if you want this topic at your site, we can talk on the phone or
exchange information by email when it is convenient.

Best wishes             Eugene

*********************************************
>
>Dear Eugene:
>
>Every 2 months, I re-try the lining@comcast.net email address that you
>gave me for Dr. Ning Li -- I can tell from return-receipts that
>somebody is reading her email, but I never get a reply. I don't have
>any additional information about her, such as a telephone number, so I
>am unable to try and get in touch with her any other way.
>
>I did a trace on a message and it appears that whomever is reading her
>emails is checking them via a web-interface off a proxy-server from
>West Point, GA.
>
>Over the last few days I have talked to magazine-writers, University
>Professors, and her research colleagues -- I'm unable to get in touch
>with anyone who knows where she's at. Marc Millis doesn't have any
>information about her, but Jonathan Campbell recalls hearing a vague
>rumor that she was ill last year.
>
>What I do have is a detailed document stating that nearly $500,000 was
>allocated to her by the Department of Defense for researching
>'AC-Gravity' effects in superconductors. This funding should have
>become effective Sept 2002.
>
>I'd like to include information about her in a piece that I'm planning
>on the 'Podkletnov Device' and your research into SC Gravitational
>Shielding -- the overall idea being that I haven't covered this topic
>in-depth yet, and I really ought to try and put as detailed a
>description online as possible.
>
>Any thoughts on which direction I should take this?
>
>Also, I'd be interested in doing an interview with you for the website
>in the near future, if and when you have available time.
>
>
>Sincerely;
>
>Tim Ventura
>http://www.americanantigravity.com
>
>

So, if that email is for real, she has been seen as of 2004.
This may be nothing, but shit like this is what makes people go out and buy rolls of tin foil for uses ofher than cooking.

14 comments:

  1. Aerospace Cos. can contact me,1 832 662 3548, for license Agreements for Anti Gravity Tech.
    View Video at http://www.dropbox.com/s/n8h0qmcq0gre570/ANTI%20GRAVITY-VRILLECTRIC-THE%20ARK.AVI … … …

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Synopsis of above is at www.scribd.com/savvys84

      Delete
  2. Did you get any news about Ning Li?

    Thanks,

    Susanne

    for:
    Göde-research on gravity
    Am Heerbach 5, 63857 Waldaschaff
    Germany

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is your institute for real? As I did not get any reply

      Delete
    2. Sorry for that late answer. Yes, we do excist :)

      http://www.goede-stiftung.org/en/

      Delete
  3. Dr.Ning Li and her research are probably classified by US Military and the military- industrial complex. Imagine the effect of a technology that rendered obsolete tires, winged and rotor aircraft, most ground transportation, jet and rocket propulsion, and energy production. The major players in the world markets do not want this kind of knowledge loose to compete with.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ya we are in insane society rule by most insane humans we can get.
    we work not for human kind but for money, and we are rule by it.
    all which can change the statuesque or fret n big corp. profits have to dissipear.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It all comes down to staying ahead of the other guys. If we can get our hands on technology that is suprior to that which other nations are currently using, we need to further research into it and make sure that other groups that may be a threat to our Nation's security do not obtain data and/or information on the Technoology or the persons involved.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i want everyone to know that Dr. Li is still alive and living well. However, she has alzheimer's disease...I had diner with her and her family few days ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is she working at Stargate Command?

      Delete
  7. Hello, and warm greetings from Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

    I believe I understand how attractive, as well
    as repulsive gravity is generated.

    My understanding comes from contemplating
    how our solar system (a complete, natural
    gravitational system) works.


    In my view, it is not so much an issue of unification
    of "gravity" and electromagnetism, but gravity
    (attractive or repulsive) being a result of spinning mass
    with its magnetic and electric fields.


    In my view, in order to fully generate gravity, we need
    a spinning mass with its magnetic, and electric field.

    In this case we have three parameters with two values each :

    direction of spin (left or right);
    orientation of magnetic poles;
    orientation of lines of electric field.


    Now, we could consider two spinning massive bodies,
    in a cosmic space, with variety mutual configurations
    of the above three parameters.

    Some of these configurations may yield gravitational attraction between
    these two bodies, some may yield gravitational repulsion, and some may,
    perhaps, even yield a gravitational stability, like in our solar system,
    see the image below: toroidal vortex (due to both spins),
    because "gravity" is even a more complex phenomenon than magnetism,
    and therefore I do not consider it to be an elementary,
    fundamental, or exclusively attractive and repulsive, force :

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72LWr7BU8Ao
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al799tMnAk8
    http://www.washington.edu/news/2014/02/03/solving-a-physics-mystery-those-solitons-are-really-vortex-rings/


    Inline image 2


    I have good reasons to think that the phenomenon of gravity
    is a so-called "emergent phenomenon".

    My approach to solving the mystery of attractive
    and repulsive gravity is a "macro-empirical" approach,
    like Faraday's, because Faraday was no quantum physicist,
    to be sure! :))

    After Faraday had laid his "macro-empirical" groundwork,
    it was only Maxwell, who finally was able to produce
    the full (non-quantum) mathematical description.
    Then again, finally, there was a quantum level
    mathematical description produced.

    So, with my hypothesis, I am at the "pre-Faraday" stage. :))

    Both, gravitomagnetism and electrogravity,
    happen to have some empirical evidence in their favor.
    My conjecture, in general, combines gravitomagnetism
    with electrogravity from the perspective
    of the Kaluza-Klein unification.


    IF, in fact, there were also to be
    a repulsive gravity, FIRST, I am deeply convinced,
    we need to be able to demonstrate this fact empirically,
    like Faraday, instead of mathematically "fish" for it,
    like Einstein did with GTR, and Superstring theorists do. :))


    All we need to empirically verify my hypothesis
    is a simple and inexpensive experiment
    that requires constructing a device that combines
    a gyroscope, a magnet, and electric capacitors :

    appropriately oriented and tuned —

    which is essentially how planets, their moons,
    and entire Solar system seems to work,
    in general.
    .

    I welcome your questions, and at the same time
    I am looking forward to our discussion,
    and especially I welcome your criticism.

    Thank you.

    With respect and much gratitude, I am
    Sincerely yours,
    Zbigniew Modrzejewski
    http://db.naturalphilosophy.org/member/?memberid=2608&subpage=contact




    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. EXPERIMENTAL quantum Anti-gravity — https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com

      I have made a theoretical as well as an empirical scientific discovery
      of quantum gravity and quantum antigravity.

      Present day quantum gravity theories suffer from
      too many mathematical space dimensions, and from
      too few conclusive experimental results.

      My hypothesis is simple, clear,
      and subject to easy empirical verification:

      https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/


      Should you have any questions or need clarification,
      I am more than happy to answer.

      Delete